Blogroll
- 321 Energy
- The Archdruid Report
- ASPO Canada
- Ali Samsam Bakhtiari
- The Sir Robert Bond Papers
- Briarpatch Magazine
- Chatham House
- Paul Chefurka
- The Council of Canadians
- The Daily Canuck
- The Daily Reckoning
- The Dominion
- Energy and Capital
- Energy Bulletin
- Feasta
- Financial Sense
- Global Public Media
- Graphoilogy
- The Garret Hardin Society
- Richard Heinberg
- Thomas Homer-Dixon
- The Housing Bubble Blog
- iTulip
- James Kunstler
- LATOC
- Darryl McMahon
- George Monbiot
- Murky View
- Dmitri Orlov
- Plants for a Future
- Raise the Hammer
- Ramsay House Project
- Rigzone Canada
- R-Squared
- Nouriel Roubini
- Safe Haven
- Shack in the Middle
- Michael Shedlock
- Treehugger
- The Tyee
- Jeff Vail
- Vive le Canada
- John Warnock
- Whiskey and Gunpowder
User login
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
There are some more interesting tidbits in the NP pump prices article:
and
Isn't Harper going in completely the wrong direction with this? That gas tax revenue will be made up for in some other way. The Toronto Star article (http://www.thestar.com/article/428316) on this also had these quotes from Harper:
So he wants to make gas cheaper and at the same time create a "significant transition to a lot less reliance on hydrocarbons"...right.
I agree, he's been pandering, but from his perspective it's a good move. The public hears the two things they want to hear, that gas taxes will not be raised and that we'll magically transition away from petroleum when the tipping point arrives. Perhaps most people see the contradiction here or, more likely, perhaps they don't, but what I'm certain about is that a lot of people don't care.
Harper seems to be doing an excellent job of staying in the 30-40% popular vote range, by toeing the Conservative MO of simultaneously offering no worthwhile solutions and viciously attacking anybody else's. I really don't know what will break the political stalemate here. Dion has the right ideas, but he absolutely lacks the strength of character to back his beliefs with action (aka the Paul Martin syndrome), and, maybe it's just me, but I swear his English is getting worse every day.
You're right though, the level of apathy in Canada these days is frightening.
TJ in Ottawa
"Dion has the right ideas, but he absolutely lacks the strength of character to back his beliefs with action (aka the Paul Martin syndrome), and, maybe it's just me, but I swear his English is getting worse every day."
I'm with you. Dion is just not a strong leader. When the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy published their report on the path forward and suggested a carbon tax, Dion was with Harper in slamming the idea. I'm glad he's changed his mind but it doesn't help with his case as being a good leader.
HEY DUDE! About 'not caring', dontcha know, we may not have tech but we do got OIL and so what if the forest industry, the tourist industry, the auto guys all dry up and blow away with the tumbleweeds, we not only have that OIL we got both kinds of energy, we got NATURAL GAS along side of OIL. So my little cowpoke, relax your well ploughed furrow ridden brow and just put your cowboy boots up on grandma's kitchen table, then with a store brand beer clasped firmly, let's all sing a chorus of Home on the Range, you know, where the skies are never cloudy all day, eh! (More fitting perhaps though could be the song of our Australian Commonwealth brothers' National bird, of course singing with one's head planted firmly in the sand gives a certain grittiness to that refrain.