![]() | Energy Decline and National GDP in 2050: The Growth of Destitution | The Oil Drum: Canada | The Energy and Environment Round-Up: November 21st 2007 | ![]() |
116 comments on The Finance Round-Up: November 16th 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
116 comments on The Finance Round-Up: November 16th 2007
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Blogroll
- 321 Energy
- The Archdruid Report
- ASPO Canada
- Ali Samsam Bakhtiari
- The Sir Robert Bond Papers
- Briarpatch Magazine
- Chatham House
- Paul Chefurka
- The Council of Canadians
- The Daily Canuck
- The Daily Reckoning
- The Dominion
- Energy and Capital
- Energy Bulletin
- Feasta
- Financial Sense
- Global Public Media
- Graphoilogy
- The Garret Hardin Society
- Richard Heinberg
- Thomas Homer-Dixon
- The Housing Bubble Blog
- iTulip
- James Kunstler
- LATOC
- Darryl McMahon
- George Monbiot
- Murky View
- Dmitri Orlov
- Plants for a Future
- Raise the Hammer
- Ramsay House Project
- Rigzone Canada
- R-Squared
- Nouriel Roubini
- Safe Haven
- Shack in the Middle
- Michael Shedlock
- Treehugger
- The Tyee
- Jeff Vail
- Vive le Canada
- John Warnock
- Whiskey and Gunpowder
User login
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
I'd respond, but I have no clue what you are trying to say.
See Klee:)
In that case, I think you need to adjust your irony detectors and re-read my posts. ;-)
Fair enough and will adjust, but to be kind on your part, with this life so fraught with care and massive information overload, your irony be not quite so flat ironed. A few more ruffles to warn the dilettante if you would be so kind.
Or speaking more literally, I apologize for the misreading of yours. I was reading the Stoneleigh for the financial and glossing on through when I came to what I considered a jarring political clanger and made that inappropriate comment. Sorry:)