![]() | The Energy and Environment Round-Up: November 6th 2007 | The Oil Drum: Canada | Energy Decline and National GDP in 2050: The Growth of Destitution | ![]() |
209 comments on World Energy to 2050: A Half Century of Decline
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
209 comments on World Energy to 2050: A Half Century of Decline
Comments can no longer be added to this story.
Blogroll
- 321 Energy
- The Archdruid Report
- ASPO Canada
- Ali Samsam Bakhtiari
- The Sir Robert Bond Papers
- Briarpatch Magazine
- Chatham House
- Paul Chefurka
- The Council of Canadians
- The Daily Canuck
- The Daily Reckoning
- The Dominion
- Energy and Capital
- Energy Bulletin
- Feasta
- Financial Sense
- Global Public Media
- Graphoilogy
- The Garret Hardin Society
- Richard Heinberg
- Thomas Homer-Dixon
- The Housing Bubble Blog
- iTulip
- James Kunstler
- LATOC
- Darryl McMahon
- George Monbiot
- Murky View
- Dmitri Orlov
- Plants for a Future
- Raise the Hammer
- Ramsay House Project
- Rigzone Canada
- R-Squared
- Nouriel Roubini
- Safe Haven
- Shack in the Middle
- Michael Shedlock
- Treehugger
- The Tyee
- Jeff Vail
- Vive le Canada
- John Warnock
- Whiskey and Gunpowder
User login
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
Actually hydro generation in US and in many other places has recently been falling.
Many factors affecting it - climate change, increased water demands for irrigation and by the population, everything adds up and the trend is negative. I can hardly see these factors reversing, quite the opposite actually.
Expecting hydro to raise its share world-wide is obviously assuming a massive program in the third world. How realistic this is I leave up to you to decide.
Unfortunately I have to conclude your optimism is quite crossing the borders of scientific realism. Same goes for wind - expecting it to surpass both hydro and nuclear based on a track record of 5 years, emerging from virtually non-existent source is... maybe way too much.
I'll let you and Pitt duke it out over the global prospects of hydro, and you and Nick can hash out the potential of wind while you're at it. For now I'm content to split the difference and disappoint both sides.
Significant hydro development may be confined to China and Canada, but I'd bet South America and Russia will put on a push as well. Regarding wind and solar, ¿Quién sabe?
No need for duking - we're gathering evidence, not disagreeing.
LevinK is pointing out that hydro production is falling in some places, although - as your graph shows - it's still growing overall and is currently at its highest level ever. I'm pointing out that substantial hydro potential still exists, even in some developed countries. No conflict.