Blogroll
- 321 Energy
- The Archdruid Report
- ASPO Canada
- Ali Samsam Bakhtiari
- The Sir Robert Bond Papers
- Briarpatch Magazine
- Chatham House
- Paul Chefurka
- The Council of Canadians
- The Daily Canuck
- The Daily Reckoning
- The Dominion
- Energy and Capital
- Energy Bulletin
- Feasta
- Financial Sense
- Global Public Media
- Graphoilogy
- The Garret Hardin Society
- Richard Heinberg
- Thomas Homer-Dixon
- The Housing Bubble Blog
- iTulip
- James Kunstler
- LATOC
- Darryl McMahon
- George Monbiot
- Murky View
- Dmitri Orlov
- Plants for a Future
- Raise the Hammer
- Ramsay House Project
- Rigzone Canada
- R-Squared
- Nouriel Roubini
- Safe Haven
- Shack in the Middle
- Michael Shedlock
- Treehugger
- The Tyee
- Jeff Vail
- Vive le Canada
- John Warnock
- Whiskey and Gunpowder
User login
Archives
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
There is a difference between off peak times and peak demand times when all the simple-cycle gas-fired combustion turbines are buring expensive fuel inefficently. Much of the degradation of transformers occurs during the brief periods of maximum temperature on those hot, high-demand days. Investment in more generation and transission capacity is driven by growth in peak demand.
That's what the analogy is about.
(1) Time of day effects can be taken care of in a simple manner with a (logically) simple time-of-day meter. During the 'rush hours', charges can be higher, as on some subway systems. Of course, if one wants to split hairs by having a continuous consumer-level auction, then dials and bleepers and lights and mindless complexity are probably needed - but
(2) I see little harm in some, or even considerable, imprecision, for the sake of simplicity, in time of day billing, because electricity has become a life-support system, a highly inappropriate place for the goal of a continuous auction, which is merely to save a few pennies by time-shifting. Anything that tends to require moderate overcapacity in generators, transformers, transmission lines, etc., will save lives by improving robustness. Reliable service at peak times will have but little effect on total consumption, and total consumption is not best addressed by killing people randomly on the coldest or hottest day of the year anyhow. And neither shiftless power-hungry NIMBY-obsessed politicians, nor quarterly-statement-driven business people, nor feckless consumers, will invest in robustness on their own - but when they are caught out, feckless consumers (or their heirs) will waste not a microsecond in filing huge lawsuits paid for by all.
BTW Kill-a-Watt type devices have become fairly cheap and are useful in learning the effects of specific (and not hard-wired) appliances, which may be obscured when they are aggregated on the main meter. IIRC somebody on Drumbeat may even have mentioned lending those out at public libraries.