![]() | Kyoto, Canadians, Energy and the Environment | The Oil Drum: Canada | Le Pic Pétrolier - Février 2007: Prévisions et les derniers chiffres de l'EIA | ![]() |
Blogroll
- 321 Energy
- The Archdruid Report
- ASPO Canada
- Ali Samsam Bakhtiari
- The Sir Robert Bond Papers
- Briarpatch Magazine
- Chatham House
- Paul Chefurka
- The Council of Canadians
- The Daily Canuck
- The Daily Reckoning
- The Dominion
- Energy and Capital
- Energy Bulletin
- Feasta
- Financial Sense
- Global Public Media
- Graphoilogy
- The Garret Hardin Society
- Richard Heinberg
- Thomas Homer-Dixon
- The Housing Bubble Blog
- iTulip
- James Kunstler
- LATOC
- Darryl McMahon
- George Monbiot
- Murky View
- Dmitri Orlov
- Plants for a Future
- Raise the Hammer
- Ramsay House Project
- Rigzone Canada
- R-Squared
- Nouriel Roubini
- Safe Haven
- Shack in the Middle
- Michael Shedlock
- Treehugger
- The Tyee
- Jeff Vail
- Vive le Canada
- John Warnock
- Whiskey and Gunpowder
User login
Archives
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.




GAIA Host Collective
Stoneleigh,
I know Canadians are touchy on the NAFTA subject, and they wish to keep the independent nation idea alive. However, in the case of the SPP pushing Mexicans to go live in Fort McMurray, you need to do more than just post a headline, in my very humble loud-mouth view.
How crazy is that anyway? Pemex is collapsing, and instead of working at home to save their own oil industry, they now have to freeze in Mordor? Know why? So the wages will come down, that's why. Them Atlantic Canadians are getting too expensive.
Makes you wonder what the price for a white corn tortilla is in Alberta these days, doesn't it?
Anybody ever wonder why NAFTA included Mexico? Wouldn't US&Canada make more sense? Why take in the poor? Easy, cheap labor is the game. And Canadian will get jobs only at the same salary that Mexicans get.
Thing is, if no-one exposes the SPP Super Nafta NAU in this stage of the game, and this is an advanced stage, all politicians and CEO's that matter in society are there, which speeds up things a lot, then it will very soon be too late. They're aiming for 2010. In utter secrecy.
Nobody does it though, in the media. The Globe and Mail can't even spell SPP, nor refer to its origins. Someone has to.
Will Canada soon exist in name only? No!!! say Canadians. But their main money making industry will be occupied by low-wage Mexicans.
SPP-NAFTA: Canada is for cheap resources, Mexico for cheap labor.
Believe me - I understand the implications, which is why I headlined the story.